[eng] This paper examines the impact of working for a temporary help
agency (THA) versus being directly employed on transitions from temporary
employment to permanent jobs, other temporary positions, or
unemployment. The focus of our analysis is on low-skilled male workers
aged between 20 and 45. Temporary help agencies also referred to
as temporary work or employment agencies, hire workers and rent
out their services to client firms. The THA sector has experienced
substantial growth since the 1990s, particularly in developed countries
with previously highly regulated labor markets.1 This growth
can be attributed to deregulation, aimed at enhancing labor market
dynamism (Autor, 2009; Fudge and Strauss, 2013; Voss et al.,
2013).2 THAs play an important role in shaping the labor market by helping firms adjust to demand fluctuations and facilitating employee
screening. Their specialization in recruiting allows them to spread
employment termination risks across firms, achieving economies of
scale and cost advantages (Houseman et al., 2003; Neugart and Storrie,
2002). On the supply side, it is commonly argued that THAs shift the
workforce composition towards individuals desiring greater workplace
flexibility (Katz and Krueger, 2019), but this comes with the transfer
of risk from the firm to the worker (Harrington and Velluzzi, 2008).