[eng] Nowadays health research faces a moment of massive publication. Every day it grows,
resulting not only in tons of new papers, but also systematic reviews (SR), meta-analysis
(MA) and, research syntheses. Umbrella reviews (UR) are systematic reviews of multiple SR
and MA on a certain topic and have appeared as a solution to the excess of emerging
published information, helping decision-makers to be updated on the latest evidence for their
professional practice. The overarching aim of the current study was to provide a big picture
of the topics covered by UR and to summarize knowledge of those focused on risk and
protective factors for diagnosed mental disorders.
In this systematic overview first, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases
were systematically searched finding 575 UR. Second, mental health articles were screened
and classified by field giving us a broader view of the current state of research in the
specialty. And third, the highest quality evidence available on risk and protective factors for
different mental disorders was analyzed through 10 UR published on the topic. Extracting
around half a thousand risk/protective factors and their association measures and classifying
them by topic in order to assess and grade the evidence acquired. As a result, 564 non purely
genetic risk/protective factors for diagnosed psychological disorders were synthetized.
Concretely, 553 potential risk factors and 11 potential protective factors. Even though, many
were associated with up to 6 different disorders which support the transdiagnostic hypothesis,
only 25 factors meet criteria to be considered class I evidence, making the existence of the
association very clear.
As a result of the incorporation of UR as research tools, various astonishingly clear
associations have been found on risk/protective factors, providing valuable information to the
scientific community and leading the path to enhance the knowledge and practice in mental
health.