Insect seed-predator networks respond positively to restoration on a tropical island

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Costa, Alba
dc.contributor.author Heleno, Rubén
dc.contributor.author Dufrene, Yanick
dc.contributor.author Huckle, Eleanor
dc.contributor.author Mendes, Sara Beatriz
dc.contributor.author Whittington, Andrew E.
dc.contributor.author F. van Veen, Frank J.
dc.contributor.author Kaiser-Bunbury, Christopher N.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-18T10:00:03Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-18T10:00:03Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11201/167234
dc.description.abstract [eng] When non-native species invade ecosystems, coevolved plant–animal interactions and associated ecological functions are altered, often to the detriment of local biodiversity. While mutualistic interactions can benefit from—and assist with—ecological restoration through the removal of non-native species, community-level changes in antagonistic interactions due to restoration are less well understood. Insect seed predators provide important ecosystem functions, but can also have antagonistic effects through pre-dispersal seed predation which can cause fruit abortion or premature fruit drop, potentially affecting plant community composition.</p><p>2. Here, we used a network approach and data on trophic interactions from a large-scale field experiment to investigate the differences in insect seed predator communities between native restored sites (where non-native plants were removed) and unrestored sites dominated by non-native plants on the island of Mahé, Seychelles.</p><p>3. Restored sites contained more individuals and species of seed predators (up by 81% and 50% respectively), and experienced a greater predation intensity (1.06 ± 0.53 vs. 0.27 ± 0.09), and predator specialisation compared to unrestored sites. The proportion of predated samples was similar between treatments (~14%). Beta diversity, measured as species and interaction turnover, increased at restored sites.</p><p>4. Synthesis and applications: Our findings imply that vegetation restoration generates marked biodiversity benefits on native seed predator communities and their interactions. However, removing non-native plants did not result in the elimination of non-native seed predators, which might require targeted control measures. Our results highlight the importance of considering the effects of restoration on antagonistic interactions, in addition to those reported for pollination and seed dispersal services. Management practices should aim to control plant invasions for the conservation of native plant communities that serve as resources and refugia both for mutualists (e.g., seed dispersers and pollinators) and native insect seed-predator antagonists, both of which benefit native ecosystem function.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.relation.ispartof 2024, vol. 61, num.11, p. 1-12
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.classification 57 - Biologia
dc.subject.other 57 - Biological sciences in general
dc.title Insect seed-predator networks respond positively to restoration on a tropical island
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type Article
dc.date.updated 2024-12-18T10:00:04Z
dc.rights.accessRights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14781


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics